Record 1: ECB Violation #39191568K — Work Without Permit / Unapproved Construction
What the source record says
The public description for 102-02 103 Avenue, Queens, NY 11417 states: “RCA ISSUED 02/12/25 BY BADGE#3292 TO SAME RESPONDENT NOT CORRECTED TWICE, WORK W/OUT PERMIT 3RD INSPECTION JOB#Q01186652-I1-GC WAS FILED TO RESTORE PORCH BACK TO OPEN W/GUARDRAILS & REMOVE PORCH ENCLOSURE,NOT R” Permit history should be compared against the alleged work, approved plans, contractor invoices, and any restoration or legalization path. Site-safety proof should be dated because DOB focuses on conditions at the inspection time.
What this category usually means
The record appears to involve work DOB alleges was performed without required approval, permit issuance, or approved documents.
What a hearing on this record may have focused on
A hearing on this type of record may have asked whether the observed work existed, whether a permit covered it, whether the respondent was legally responsible, and whether the work was restored or legalized.
Documents and proof worth reviewing now
- before-and-after photos
- contractor records
- legalization or restoration proof
- permits
- approved drawings
Why this should not be ignored
Unpermitted work can block approvals, complicate closing or refinancing, and trigger repeat penalties.
- 201 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT