What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Elevator / Vertical Transportation; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing dates are October 15, 2026, October 23, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 6, 2026, March 22, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39199397L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2 ITEMS: EXCESSIVE CLEARANCE OBSERVED ON THE RETURN SIDE OF CAR DOOR. THE MEASURED GAP EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LIMIT. PROPER DOOR ALIGNMENT AND CLEARANCES SHALL BE RESTORED TO ENSURE SAFE OPERATION,
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35716831M
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 22, 2025; hearing October 23, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AC28-323.8 AND RCNY 103-15(5). FAILURE TO SECURE TO SECURE PUBLIC SAFETY AND/OR MAKE THE BUILDING STRUCTURE AND APPURTENANCES CONFORM TO THEPROVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AFTER UNSAFE NOTIFICATION FILED B
Cited provision(s): 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review