What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Crane / Hoist / Derricks; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 1, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39556956L
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO A COMPLAINT OF AN INCIDENT WHERE TWO LARGE SWING GATES FOR THE HOIST SWING INTO THE SHAFT-WAY CAUSING THE HOIST TO STRUCK THE GATES, THE HOIST WAS REPAIRED AND RETURNED TO SERVICE. UPON REQUEST FO
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39556959R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO A COMPLAINT OF INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED ON 07-21-2026 AT APPROXIMATELY 14:40, WHERE TWO LARGE SWING GATES FOR THE HOIST WERE NOT PROPERLY PINNED IN THE CLOSED POSITION, ALLOWING THEM TO SWING INTO T
Cited provision(s): 193 — BC 3310.8.2 SITE SAFETY MANAGER/COORDINATOR FAILED TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DEPAR
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review