Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200650L
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED THE USE OF A FRANCO COUPLING ON THE DRAINAGE PIPING OF SINK WHICH IS PROHIBITED .AS PER PC 705.4.3 MECHANICAL JOINT COUPLINGS FOR HUBLESS PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL CONSIST OF AN ELASTOMERIC SEALING SLEEV
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records