What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Illegal Occupancy / Conversion; Plumbing / Gas; Elevator / Vertical Transportation. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 7, 2026, July 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Illegal Occupancy / Conversion — Summons 39197095R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 20, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: ALTERED/CHANGED BUILDING OCCUPIED WITHOUT A VALID CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AS PER 28-118.3.1 - 28-118.3.2. BUILDING WAS ALTERED UNDER ALT 1 JOB #122668121 WITH PERMIT ISSUED 12/14/2016, NO NEW C/O ISSUED AS REQ
Cited provision(s): 208 — 28-118.3 ALTER/CHANGE BLDG OCCUP W/O VALID C/O PER 28-118.3.1,28-118.3.2
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The key question is whether the observed occupancy or layout matches the lawful use of the premises. Resolution may require restoring the prior lawful layout/use or, when legally feasible, filing plans and obtaining approvals to legalize the condition.
Hearing issues to verify
- What use and number of dwelling/occupancy units are shown by the Certificate of Occupancy, Schedule of Occupancy or other lawful-use records?
- Did the inspector accurately identify how the space was being used on the cited date?
- Was the cited space actually occupied as alleged, or were the observed beds, kitchens, locks or partitions consistent with another lawful use?
- Is there an approved filing or historical record supporting the present use?
Evidence that may matter
- Certificate of Occupancy / Schedule of Occupancy and approved plans
- Historic occupancy records, permits and prior approved layouts
- Dated photographs and floor plans
- Leases, tenant records or sworn statements concerning actual use
- Permits/inspection records if the condition was legalized or restored
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 39197104J
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 20, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. EXHAUST DISCHARGE MUST BE NO CLOSER THAN 10 FEET FROM BUILDING OPENINGS AS PER MC 501.2 (2014 . AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED THE EXHAUST VENT OF DRYER
Cited provision(s): 285 — §28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. EXHAUST DISCH
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39199755M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2 ITEMS: IN-CAR COMMUNICATION IS NOT CONNECTED TO A CONTINUOUSLY STAFFED LOCATION, AS REQUIRED BY NYC BUILDING CODE ASME A17.1 2.27.1.1. CAR VENTILATION FAN IS INOPERATIVE AND DOES NOT PROVIDE REQUIRED VE
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review