What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; 2 Electrical Work / Electrical Permit summonses; 2 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200470Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ON THE ROOF ON THE COOLING TOWER UNIT A CRACKED VALVE ALSO PIPE CONNECTION MADE WITH FERNCO COUPLES . MC 908.1 - COOLING TOWERS: COOLING TOWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANC
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200482L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES. OBSERVED THRU OUT HALLWAYS AND CHILDREN PLAY ROOM NO INSTALLATION OF TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES AND IN THE MECHANICAL RMS NO G
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200471X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING, MULTIPLE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER HEADS WERE OBSERVED OBSTRUCTED. MULTIPLE SPRINKLER HEADS WERE OBSERVED WITH THEIR ESCUTCHEONS/CAPS PAINTED AND OR MISSING
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200480H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES OR WIRING IN USE. OBSERVED IN THE MAIN LOBBY AND BACK STORAGE AREA EXPOSED BX AND SJ CORD FEEDING HUNG HEATERS SJ COR
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200564P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1: 1. DLM MALFUNCTIONING AND NOT PROVIDING REQUIRED DOOR LOCK MONITORING. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.12. REMEDY: REPAIR DLM TO RESTORE PROPER MONITORING. CLASS 2: 2. CAR PRODUCES WHISTLING NOISE WHILE TRAVELING.
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39200481J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. OBSERVED IN THE BASEMENT 4 NEW 200 AMP DISCONNECT SW AND 1 1600 AMP DISTRIBUTION INSTALLED WITH BX RISERS. ALSO IN LOBBY AND BASEMENT HUNG ELECTRIC HEATERS INSTALLED WITH BX AN
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200565R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1 C/U: 1. COMPENSATION CHAIN DRAGGING ON PIT FLOOR, CREATING HAZARDOUS INTERFERENCE WITH PIT EQUIPMENT. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.2. REMEDY: ADJUST AND SECURE COMPENSATION CHAIN TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANT FLOOR CLEA
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review