What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Façade / Exterior Wall; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 4, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39557590K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: DURING THE INSPECTION OF FACADE ALTERATION OF 33 STORY BUILDING OBSERVED SWS AT EXPOSURE 1 WAS USED AS STORAGE FOR EQUIPMENT( PORTABLE TOILET) & NOT IN SWS DRAWING. THIS IMPROPER LOADING PLACES EXCESSIVE STRESS
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557589N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: DURING THE INSPECTION OF ALTERATION 33 STORY BUILDING OBSERVED AT EXP# 1 & 4 COMMERCIAL ADVERTISEMENT ON THE SWS PARAPET. CONTRARY TO THE NYC ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 3301.9.1 AND 3301.9.2. WHICH PROHIBIT COMMERCIAL
Cited provision(s): 2F4 — BC3307.1.1/BC3307.4.6 POSTING OF UNLAWFUL SIGNS/INFO/PICTURES/ADS ON PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review