What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 11 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Work Without a Permit; Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Other Building / Code Compliance; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Plumbing / Gas. The hearing dates are October 15, 2026, October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 11, 2026, August 17, 2026, June 25, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200049K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2: 1. DROP CEILING SECTION LEADING TO TOP EXIT (ESCAPE HATCH) NOT PROPERLY SECURED FROM TOP OF CAR. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.14. REMEDY: SECURE CEILING SECTION. 2. SEPARATION OF CAR DOORS AT BOTTOM WHILE CAR I
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39200102K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. OBSERVED ON THE GROUND FL KITCHEN ELECTRIC OVEN / FOOD WARMER INSTALLED WITH DISCONNECT SW 3/4 PIPE COMING FROM KITCHEN PANEL. CHECKED BIS / DOB NOW NO PERMIT ON FILE ALL WORK
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200129K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED HOLE PENETRATIONS THROUGHOUT BUILDING. PREVIOUS VIOLATING # 39156212X., REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39193758K
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 25, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: ADMIT/IN-VIO
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SUBMIT A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39110398J ISSUED ON 04-01-2024 FOR WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT.(NO PERMIT ON DOB RECORD ), COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200100R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES OR WIRING IN USE. OBSERVED IN THE REAR CORRIDOR A HUNG ELECTRIC HEATER WITH A FLEX CORD PASSING THRU THE CEILING. IN
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39200103M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO INSTALL GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR. OBSERVED IN THE MAIN ELECTRICAL RM NO INSTALLATION ON ELECTRODE GROUND ROD ALSO THE MAIN HOUSE WATER GROUND CLAMP IS RUSTED AND THE WATER METER IS NOT JUMPED. A
Cited provision(s): 1D9 — EC 250.64 FAIL TO INSTALL GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR AS PER SECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39200130H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED GARBAGE BINS OBSTRUCTING EGRESS PASSAGEWAY. LOCATED THROUGHOUT BUILDING., REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200048Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2: 1. MAIN LINE BOX COVER CAN BE OPENED WHILE POWER IS ON, FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED SECURED ACCESS. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.26. REMEDY: SECURE MAIN LINE BOX COVER TO PREVENT ACCESS UNDER POWER. 2. WATER AC
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200101Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROTECT CONDUCTOR(S) AGAINST OVERCURRENT. OBSERVED IN BOTH ELEVATOR MACHINE RMS THAT THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION IS INCORRECT BOTH ARE FUSED AT 100 AMP #6 AWG SHALL BE FUSED AT THE PROPER OVERCURRENT
Cited provision(s): 2D9 — EC 240.4 FAILURE TO PROTECT CONDUCTOR(S) AGAINST OVERCURRENT PER EC
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200809Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED W HOT WATER HEATERS INSTALLED WITHOUT PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES WHICH IS CONTRARY TO CODE PC 504.6 ESTABLISHES THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGE PIPING SERVING TEMPERATURE AND PRESS
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 39200810L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED IN THE LOBBY AREA A SINK THAT WAS INSTALLED WITH OUT A TRAP USING A WASHER MACHINE STYLE HOSE FOR DRAINAGE PC 1002.1 - PLUMBING FIXTURES AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROPERLY
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 11 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review