What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Work Without a Permit. The hearing dates are October 22, 2026, October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026, August 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39200588J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION COMPLIANCE INSPECTION WAS NOT ABLE TO BE PERFORMED DUE TO NO APPROVED PLANS BEING PROVIDED ON SITE, WHILE CONSTRUCTION WORK WAS BEING PERFORMED UNDER JOB# 102091264. BC 3301.7, MAINTAIN/DI
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39200589L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION APPROX. 1PM. OBSERVED FAILURE TO FILE A REQUIRED TENANT PROTECTION PLAN UNDER JOB# 102091264. 28-120.1, FILE A TPP
Cited provision(s): 1N2
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201261M
CLASS - 3 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED IN APT. 8B UNCOVER ELECTRICAL BOXES EXPOSING WIRING., REPAIR AND OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 302 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201262Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED PERMIT HOLDER WITH CONSTRUCTION WORK UNDER ACTIVE PERMIT # 102091264-01-EW-OT FAIL TO MAINTAIN FIRE STOPPING AS REQUIREMENT IN KITCHEN WALL WITH PIPE RISER THAT CONNECT ALL PIPE T
Cited provision(s): 239 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: NO FIRE STOPPIN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39201260K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED PERMIT HOLDER WITH CONSTRUCTION WORK UNDER ACTIVE PERMIT # 102091264-01-EW-OT FAIL TO PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS PER FIRE CODE., COMPLY WITH FIRE CODE
Cited provision(s): 2N6
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39201263X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED PERMIT HOLDER WITH CONSTRUCTION WORK UNDER ACTIVE PERMIT # 102091264-01-EW-OT FAIL TO POST PERMIT AS REQUIRED THROUGH OUT., POST/PROPERLY POST PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 220 — §28-105.11 FAILURE TO POST PERMIT FOR WORK AT PREMISES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review