What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Façade / Exterior Wall; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing date is October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 15, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39556626Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 15, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 33. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION WORK WAS OBSERVED ATTHE 27-STORY BUILDING. WORKERS WERE PERFORMING FACADE WORK. NO STRUCTU
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556628M
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 15, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 27 STORY BUILDING I OBSERVED UNSAFE SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD OPERATIONS. WORKERS OPERATING SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDS AT EXP 1 AND 2 SEEN WORKER AT DIFFERENT LEVELS S
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review