What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 17, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558023Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION SPOKE WITH CP AND REQUEST THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE DOCUMENTS WHICH WHERE NOT PROVIDED. STRUCTURAL STABILITY LETTER FOR USE OF PARAPET CLAMPS ON PARAPET WALLS AND 3RD MAN LETTER. AFTER GIVING
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558026Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION UPON REQUESTING THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS TO COMPETENT PERSON HE COULD NOT PROVIDED THEM. COMPLETE SIDEWALK SHED DRAWINGS, SHED HAS STORAGE ON DECK UNABLE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH DRAWINGS,
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558024K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD PLATFORMS SETUP AT EXP. 1 AND 2. UPON COMPARE THEM WITH SKY CLIMBER SPECS PROVIDED BY CP NOTICE THEY DO NOT CONFORM. NO TOP FRONT RAIL INSTALL ON NONE OF THEM.
Cited provision(s): 2F6 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558027X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED NO INFORMATION PANEL ON SIDEWALK SHED. UPON INQUIRE CP SAID THEY REMOVE THE SIGN TO INSTALLED ADVERTISEMENT SIGNAGE. CONDITION CONTRARY TO BUILDING CODE 3301.9. POST REQUIRE INF
Cited provision(s): 217 — BC 3301.9,27-10009(C) FAIL TO PROVIDE/POST SIGN(S) AT JB SITE PURSUANT TO SUBSEC
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39558022R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDS SET UP AT EXP. 1 AND 2. UPON REVIEWING APPROVED DRAWINGS NOTICE WORK DOES NOT CONFORM. NODETAILS PROVIDED FOR SEVERAL SCAFFOLD WITH 7 AND 8 FRAMES HIGH. FRAME
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review