What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 8 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Work Without a Permit; Elevator / Vertical Transportation. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 18, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558076M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION ON ACTIVE SITE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT COULD NOT PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS. SIDEWALK SHED AND SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD DRAWINGS, INSTALLATION LETTERS AND DAILY INSPECTIONS FOR BOTH. N
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558079H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ON ENTIRE SITE OBSERVED INADEQUATE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS WITH EXPIRED INSPECTION TAGS, STORE ON FLOOR, NO SIGNAGE. OBSERVED ON SEVERAL FLOOR EVIDENCE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558082Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON DIFFERENT FLOORS. UPON REQUIRE SITE SAFETY TRAINING CARDS TO A GROUP OF WORKERS, THEY SAID THEY WILL GET THE CARDS BUT NEVER CAME BACK TO PROVIDE
Cited provision(s): 2L3 — BC 3321.1 FAILURE TO ENSURE EACH WORKER HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558074Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS PER DOB RECORDS JOB APPLICATION M01277486 REQUIRES SSM TO BE ON SITE. UPON INQUIRE ABOUT SSM, CONSTRUCTION SUPER SAID HE WAS NOT ON SITE, NO RECO
Cited provision(s): 119 — BC 3310.5,27-1009(D) FAIL TO HAVE SITE SAFETY MGR/COORDINATOR PRESENT AS REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39558077Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UPON REVIEWING SITE SAFETY PLAN NOTICE SOME AREAS DOES NOT CONFORM. AT EXP. 3 ON 2ND FLOOR OBSERVED A TERRACE AND ON ADJ. PROPERTY OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCA
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558080P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SEVERAL LOCATION WITH LARGE OPENINGS ON CONCRETE SLABS. OBSERVED INADEQUATE GUARDRAIL SYSTEM, MISSING TOE BOARDS OR NOT IN CONTACT WITH DECK. ALSO OBSERVED AREAS WHERE RAILINGS NO
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39558075K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ON GOING HOT WORK ON ELEVATOR SHAFT. SPARKS WHERE FALLING ON FLAMMABLE MATERIALS UNDER HOT WORK INCLUDING ELEVATOR. OBSERVED ONLY ONE PERSON NEAR HOT WORK OTHER THAN WORKER PRODUC
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558081R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1, 2 AND 4. NO INFORMATION PANEL POSTED ON ANY OF THIS EXPOSURE CONTRARY TO BC 3301.9. UNSAFE CONDITION DUE TO FIRST RESPONDENTS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOCA
Cited provision(s): 217 — BC 3301.9,27-10009(C) FAIL TO PROVIDE/POST SIGN(S) AT JB SITE PURSUANT TO SUBSEC
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 8 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review