What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Crane / Hoist / Derricks. The hearing date is October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 11, 2026, August 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39199454Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: THE CRANE USER BARONE STEEL INC.,FAILED TO NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT PROPERLY OF THE MOBILE CRANE'S(LIEBHERR LTM1300-6.3 CD5946 CN18926) ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE FROM THIS SITE. THEY MUST MAKE THE NOTIFICATION 24/48 H
Cited provision(s): 1M2
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557792Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE STRUCTURAL WORK. OBSERVED WORKERS MODIFYING STEEL CONNECTION ON SITE. UPON REQUESTING ENGINEER APPROVAL OR SHOP DRAWINGS ALLOWING ON SITE MODIFICATIONS NONE WERE PROVIDED.
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557794M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED UNENCLOSED PERIMETER WITH INADEQUATE GUARDRAIL CABLE SYSTEM PROTECTION. ZERO CABLE HAS GAPS BETWEEN SLAB AND CABLE UP TO APPROX. 3". CONDITION CONTRARY TO BC 3308.5.3.1 WHICH STAT
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557793K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ON MULTIPLE LEVEL INADEQUATE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS. MISSING/BROKEN INSPECTION TAGS, NO PRESSURE, STORE ON FLOOR, MISSING MONTHLY INSPECTION SIGNATURES AND EXPIRE TAGS. INADEQUATE EXT
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review