What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 16 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 7 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; 5 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 2 Egress / Exit Obstruction summonses. The hearing dates are October 15, 2026, October 19, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 18, 2025, July 25, 2025, June 2, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39540907Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON REQUESTING CONSTRUCTION SUPER LOGS COMPETENT PERSON COULD NOT PROVIDED. THERE IS NO RECORD OF CS INSPECTIONS. SITE HAS FOUND WITH MULTIPLE VIO
Cited provision(s): 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39540895K
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UPON REQUESTING THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS CP COULD NOT PROVIDE THEM. SITE SAFETY PLAN, SIDEWALK SHED DRAWINGS, INITIAL INSTALLATION LETTER FOR SWS AND SUPP
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39540896M
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON INSPECTING UNENCLOSED PERIMETER NOTICE MISSING AND INADEQUATE TOE BOARDS. IN SOME AREAS NO TOE BOARDS INSTALLED AND ALSO ON MULTIPLE LOCATION
Cited provision(s): 118 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OT TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39540897Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. OBSERVED ON MULTIPLE FLOORS MATERIALS STORE NEAR UNENCLOSED PERIMETER. OBSERVED MATERIALS STORE HANGING ON GUARDRAIL SYSTEM DIRECTLY ABOVE WORKING
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39540898X
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. BUILDING CURRENTLY AT 5TH FLOOR, ONLY TEMPORARY STAIRS INSTALLED. WORK PERMIT FILE AS ALTERATION ENLARGEMENT. AS PER BC 3303.11.2 AT LEAST 1 PERMAN
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39540900X
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON CHECKING SITE SAFETY TRAINING CARDS TO SEVERAL WORKERS FOUND 2 CANCELLED CARDS. AFTER SCANNING SST CARDS FROM SEGUNDO J. BARRERA AND LUIS C. Z
Cited provision(s): 2L3 — BC 3321.1 FAILURE TO ENSURE EACH WORKER HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39540901H
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. OBSERVED INADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING ON MULTIPLE FLOORS. EXCESSIVE MATERIALS AND DEBRIS ON DIFFERENT FLOORS. NO ADEQUATE EGRESS TRIPPING HAZARDS OBSERV
Cited provision(s): 212 — BC 3303.4,27-1018 FAIL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HSEKEEPING PER SECTIONS REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39542845L
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3314-OBSERVED PIPE SCAFFOLD @ EXPOSURE 1 WITH MULTIPLE MAKE-SHIFT CONNECTIONS, TIE-IN POINTS WITH MAKE-SHIFT CONNECTIONS, AND ACCESS POINTS CONNECTED TO THE SLAB WITH PIECES OF PLYWOOD, OPEN EDGES W/OUT GUARDRA
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39542848R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED ACTIVE JOBSITE FORMING THE 6TH FLOOR ON ADJACENT TO QUEENSBORO BRIDGE APPROACH RAMP @ EXPO 2 WITHOUT PROTECTION FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CROSSING BETWEEN QUEENS & MANHATTAN. SITE SAFETY PLAN PROVIDED REFL
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39542849Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3301.5-OBSERVED RESHORES SUPPORTING MULTIPLE FLOORS RESTING ON MAKE-SHIFT WOOD BLOCKS, ALUMINUM PARTS ON UNSUITABLE SOIL FROM CELLAR/ FLOOR ABOVE, WALLER @ CELLAR SECURED W/ MAKE-SHIFT TIMBER ON EXISTING BRICK
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39542850X
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: ACTIVE SITE CS FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES WITHOUT PROVIDING OVERHEAD PROTECTION QUEENSBORO BRIDGE APPROACHING RAMP@ EXP.2, ADJACENT PROPERTY @ EXP.3 &4 , INADEQUATE LOGS, INADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING BLOCKING EGRESS,
Cited provision(s): 1G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THRU BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39542878H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED MULTIPLE OPEN AREAS AT THE LEADING EDGES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BUILDING, LOADED WITH MATERIALS AND DEBRIS, ABOVE WORKING AREAS WITHOUT GUARDRAILS, AND STAIR CONNECTIONS WITHOUT GUARDRAILS. STOP ALL WOR
Cited provision(s): 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39542879J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ABOVE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT EXPOSURES 3 & 4 WITHOUT PROTECTION, WITH DEBRIS SCATTERED. FAILURE TO PROVIDE PROTECTION CREATES AN UNSAFE & HAZARDOUS CONDITION TO PREVENT POSSIBLE
Cited provision(s): 1P3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39542880R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3307.4.3-OBSERVED BOBCAT MACHINE ( EXCAVATOR ) PARKED ON THE STREET WITHOUT PROTECTION FROM VEHICULAR TRAFFIC COMMUTING THROUGH THE QUEENSBORO BRIDGE APPROACH RAMP. STOP ALL USE/ OCCUPANCY OF THE STREET. PROVID
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39542881Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 25, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED LARGE AMOUNTS OF DEBRIS, MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT FROM CELLAR TO FORMING 6 FLOOR SCATTERED THRU ENTIRE SITE, BLOCKING EGRESS CREATE A TRIPPING AND FALL HAZARD FOR PERSONAL ON SITE AND FIRST RESPONDERS IN C
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39543802X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FOLLOWING UP ON A COMPLAINT WHERE EXP#4 ADJOINING PROPERTY, WAS WATER-DAMAGED AT THE BASEMENT LEVEL. MY INSPECTION WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE THAT SAID DAMAGES WERE CAUSED BY THE ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE. NO VIO-
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 16 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review