What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 9 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 6 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 3 Work Without a Permit summonses. The hearing date is October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 29, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557249R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS HYDRAULIC PUMP JACKS/SHORING POSTS SUPPORTING A TEMPORARY FREESTANDING FLOOR/STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLY NOT INDICATED ON THE DOB APPROVED PLANS.TEMP SUPPORT INSTALLATION WAS ERECTED&MAINTAINED WITHOUT APPROVED ENG
Cited provision(s): 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557252H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3301.6.4 OBS. MAKESHIFT WORK PLATFORMS CONSTRUCTED OF WOOD PLANKS SUPPORTED BY STRUCTURAL STEEL/SCAFFOLD MEMBERS. PLATFORM INSTALLATION DID NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTR. DOCS.; APPROVED SCAFFOLD COMPONENTS A
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557256P
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS. SIDEWALK SHED POSTS WITHIN AN ACTIVE VEHICULAR DRIVEWAY LACKED REQ'D HIGH VISIBILITY MARKINGS. UNMARKED POSTS CREATED AN IMPACT HAZARD TO VEHICLES ENTERING AND EXITING THE DRIVEWAY. SIDEWALK SHED WAS NOT M
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557250Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS. SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD AT EXP. 1, 2 & 3 NOT CONFORMING TO APPR. CD. OUTRIGGERS INSTALLED W/4 FT OUTREACH VS. APPR. 2 FT. BETA MAX 1,200-LB HOISTS USED WHERE 1,000-LB HOISTS WERE APPR. MASONRY FRAMES/4 FT FRAME
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557253J
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3314.4.4.5 OBS. ACCUM. CONSTR. DEBRIS & LOOSE MATERIALS STORED ON SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD PLATFORM. DEBRIS REDUCED USABLE WALKING/WORKING SURFACE AND CREATED TRIP HAZARDS FOR WORKERS. SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD WAS NOT MAI
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557257R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS. TEMP CONSTR. FENCE INSTALLED ALONG ACTIVE DRIVEWAY WAS NOT PAINTED HUNTER GREEN AND LACKED REQ'D VIEWING PORTS. FENCE DID NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED TEMPORARY PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, OBSTRUCTED VISIBILITY FO
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557251X
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS. SIDEWALK SHED NOT CONFORMING TO APPROVED DWGS. DEBRIS/MATERIALS INCL. SCAFFOLD SHANTY STORED ON TOP OF SHED AT EXP. 2. SHED MISSING REQ'D X-BRACES/BAYS AND RT. ANGLE PIPE CLAMPS; SEVERAL SHED POSTS OBSERVE
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557255N
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS. INADEQ. HOUSEKEEPING THROUGHOUT SIDEWALK SHED. CONSTR. DEBRIS, REFUSE, LOOSE MATS., SCAFFOLD COMPONENTS, MASONRY UNITS, PALLETS, TOOLS & STORED MATERIALS ACCUM. ON WALKING/WORKING SURFACES AND ACCESS WAYS,
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557258Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3307.6.4.2.2 AT TIME OF INSPECTION, SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE #2 OBSERVED BEING USED FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS, DEBRIS, AND EQUIPMENT,SHANTY INCLUDING ON TOP OF SHED ROOF. STORAGE NOT IN DESIGNATED AREA AND CONT
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 9 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review