What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are June 2, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39554907X
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED BUILDING CURRENTLY UP TO THE 6TH LEVEL. RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE THE ADJOINING BUILDING WITH ADEQUATE ROOF PROTECTION OF 20 FEET "THE ENTIRE ROOF" AT EXPOSURE 2, LEAVING THE EXPOSED PORTION OF THE
Cited provision(s): 2P4
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39554908H
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED ONGOING CONSTRUCTION AT THE 6TH LEVEL. THE ADJOINING BUILDING AT EXP. 4 HAS PATIO FURNITURE EXPOSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITH NO OVERHEAD/ROOF PROTECTION. 3309.13. IN ADDITION, THE REAR OF THE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39554910R
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SCAFFOLDING INSTALLED AT EXPO #1 & #3 NOT MAINTAINED AS PER CODE 3314.5.5. PLANKS ARE NOT TIED DOWN AND ARE LOOSE/MISSING. PLATFORMED NOT FULLY DECKED. 3314.5. INADEQUATE NETTING AND MISSING TOEBOARDS
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39554911Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 2, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SITE IN THE ELEVATOR SHAFT MAKESHIFT PLATFORMS WERE BEING USED TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION WORK. ALSO AT THE 5TH LEVEL OF THE STAIRCASE, A MAKESHIFT PLATFORM WAS INSTALLED OUT OF PLYW
Cited provision(s): 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review