BuildingViolation.com

October 2026 NYC DOB / OATH Hearing — BIN 1045237

Manhattan property record with 4 OATH/ECB summons records in the supplied October 2026 hearing extract. Hearing date: October 15, 2026.

Need representation for this October hearing?

We can review the summons, agency record, correction status and available evidence; define the hearing strategy; prepare the authorized submission or appearance; and coordinate the underlying violation-resolution work separately where needed. Because hearing deadlines are fixed, substantive work begins after scope, authorization and payment.

Property / Hearing Identifiers

Primary hearing issue: Other Building / Code Compliance

BoroughManhattan
BIN1045237
Block / Lot01453 / 0007
October Records4
Official violation location: Loading from NYC OATH public records…
Address is resolved from the OATH Hearings Division Case Status record for OATH ticket 035727847K (source ECB number 35727847K). BIN and block/lot remain shown below for verification.

October 2026 Hearing Records

OATH/ECB #HearingSeverityHearing statusBalanceAlleged conditionCode / section
35727846Z
ACTIVE
October 15, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $2,500.00 PERMENANT DWELLING USED/CONVERTED FOR OTHER THAN PERMANENT RESIDENTIALPURPOSES. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS RECORDS INDICATES PREMISES TO BE LEGALLY APPROVED AS A CLASS "A" MULTIPLE DWELLING. ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY NOTE 2F3 — BC 28-210.3 PERM.DWELLING OFFERED/USED/CONV TO OTHER THAN PERM.RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE
35727847K
ACTIVE
October 15, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 PENDING $2,500.00 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. LACK OF REQUIRED NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS FOR EVERY FLOOR AS PER B. C. 1018.1(2008CODE); 27-366; B. C. 1021.1(2014 CODE) B. C. 1006.3(2022 CODE) FOR TRA 189 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. FAILURE TO PR
35727848M
ACTIVE
October 15, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 PENDING $2,500.00 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. LACK OF A SYSTEM OF AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS WHERE REQUIRED AS PER B. C. 903.2 AND 27-954 FOR TRANSIENT USE AT UNIT 3R ON THE 3RD FLOOR. REMEDY: DISCONTINUE 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
35727849Y
ACTIVE
October 15, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 PENDING $2,500.00 B. C. 907.2.8. FAILURE TO PROVIDE CLASS "J" FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FOR TRANSIENT USE AT UNIT 3R ON THE 3RD FLOOR. REMEDY: DISCONTINUE ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY. 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS

What DOB is alleging at this property

This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are June 16, 2026.

Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.

Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35727846Z

CLASS - 2 · Issued June 16, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: PERMENANT DWELLING USED/CONVERTED FOR OTHER THAN PERMANENT RESIDENTIALPURPOSES. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS RECORDS INDICATES PREMISES TO BE LEGALLY APPROVED AS A CLASS "A" MULTIPLE DWELLING. ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY NOTE

Cited provision(s): 2F3 — BC 28-210.3 PERM.DWELLING OFFERED/USED/CONV TO OTHER THAN PERM.RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
  • Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
  • Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?

Evidence that may matter

  • Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
  • Dated photographs and videos
  • Permits, approved plans and inspection results
  • Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition

Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 35727847K

CLASS - 1 · Issued June 16, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. LACK OF REQUIRED NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS FOR EVERY FLOOR AS PER B. C. 1018.1(2008CODE); 27-366; B. C. 1021.1(2014 CODE) B. C. 1006.3(2022 CODE) FOR TRA

Cited provision(s): 189 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. FAILURE TO PR

How this type of condition is typically resolved

Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
  • Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
  • Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?

Evidence that may matter

  • Dated photographs showing the exit path
  • Approved floor/egress plans
  • Building or security logs
  • Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions

Failure to Maintain — Summons 35727848M

CLASS - 1 · Issued June 16, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. LACK OF A SYSTEM OF AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS WHERE REQUIRED AS PER B. C. 903.2 AND 27-954 FOR TRANSIENT USE AT UNIT 3R ON THE 3RD FLOOR. REMEDY: DISCONTINUE

Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER

How this type of condition is typically resolved

Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
  • Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
  • Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?

Evidence that may matter

  • Dated before/after photographs
  • Repair invoices and contractor statements
  • Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
  • Maintenance logs and prior inspection records

Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35727849Y

CLASS - 1 · Issued June 16, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: B. C. 907.2.8. FAILURE TO PROVIDE CLASS "J" FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FOR TRANSIENT USE AT UNIT 3R ON THE 3RD FLOOR. REMEDY: DISCONTINUE ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY.

Cited provision(s): 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
  • Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
  • Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?

Evidence that may matter

  • Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
  • Dated photographs and videos
  • Permits, approved plans and inspection results
  • Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition

Case-specific next step

For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.

Submit These Summonses for Review

What to do before the hearing

1. Verify the summons

Confirm the scheduled date, respondent, violation location, charges and current OATH status.

2. Preserve evidence

Gather permits, photographs, contracts, inspection records, professional letters and proof of correction that actually relate to the cited condition.

3. Separate hearing from correction

A hearing result and physical/agency correction are not always the same task. Plan both tracks where required.

Official Hearing Record

Verify the current hearing status and violation location in the NYC OATH Hearings Division Case Status data before relying on any public directory.

NYC OATH Case Status Data →

OATH evidence and DOB correction records

OATH advises respondents to bring or submit the evidence needed to prove their case, including legal or official records, photographs, documents and witnesses. For a DOB Certificate of Correction, DOB may require supporting material such as photographs, receipts, permits and inspection results in addition to the required correction information and applicable civil-penalty documentation.