What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing date is October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 24, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39558267P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 24, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT WHERE A WORKER FELL OFF A PLATFORM LADDER ON THE 3RD FLOOR INTO THE ELEVATOR SHAFT FALLING TO THE 1ST FLOOR. UPON REVIEWING THE DAILY PRE-SHIFT SAFETY MEETING IT WAS NOTED THAT WORK AB
Cited provision(s): 1K1 — BC 3301.12.2 FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE REQUIRED INFORMATION TO WORKERS DURING PRE-SHIF
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39558265L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 24, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT WHERE A WORKER FELL OFF A PLATFORM LADDER ON THE 3RD FLOOR INTO THE ELEVATOR SHAFT FALLING TO THE 1ST FLOOR. INSPECTION REVEALED THAT THE WORKER WAS WORKING AT A HIGH OF MORE THAT 6 FE
Cited provision(s): 109 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39558268R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 24, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTE: AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED THAT THERE WERE NO LIGHTS INSTALLED AT THE ELEVATOR VESTIBULE, WHICH CREATES A FALL/TRIP HAZARD AND ALSO REDUCED VISIBILITY TO PROPERLY USE/SET UP ANY EQUIPMENT CONTRARY T
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39558266N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 24, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: RESPONDING TO AN INCIDENT WHERE A WORKER FELL OFF A PLATFORM LADDER ON THE 3RD FLOOR INTO THE ELEVATOR SHAFT FALLING TO THE 1ST FLOOR. INSPECTION REVEALED THAT THE LADDER WAS PLACED IN A UNSAFE MANNER ( THE BAS
Cited provision(s): 1N4
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review