What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Site Safety / Safeguarding; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Work Without a Permit; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing date is October 27, 2026; the source issue date(s) are February 20, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39139020R
CLASS - 1 · Issued February 20, 2025; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED DEMO WORK THROUGHOUT COMMERCIAL SPACE 1ST FLOORS UNDER PARTIAL DEMOLITION WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS, PE SHOP DRAWINGS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROVED PLANS AND/OR PE REVISED DRAWINGS CREATES UNSAFE CONDITION
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39139023M
CLASS - 1 · Issued February 20, 2025; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED UNSUITABLE, ELECTRICAL CONDITIONS CREATING A POTENTIAL ELECTRICAL HAZARD, UNSAFE UNSUITABLE NON-CODE COMPLIANT ELECTRICALWORK. OPEN CONDUCTORS AND EXPOSED WIRING.PANELS WITHOUT COVERS, USED OF TEM
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39139026H
CLASS - 1 · Issued February 20, 2025; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI ON AN ACTIVE JOBSITE, OBSERVED ELECTRICAL WORK/DEMO BEING DONE THROUGHOUT 1ST FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE. UPON REVIEWING. AND DOING A SEARCH ON BIS/DOB NOW REVEAL TO ME THAT NO PERMIT WAS ISSUED FOR ELECTRICAL
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39139029N
CLASS - 1 · Issued February 20, 2025; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI ON A ACTIVE JOBSITE, OBSERVED UNLICENSED ELECT DEMO BEING PERFORM 3 WORKERS NAME,KEV RONCANO/JUAN PACA/LUIS YANZA&ANOTHER WORKER NOT NAMED INFORM ME THAT THEY ALL WORK FOR CJS INDUSTRIES INC,WHO IS NOT AN
Cited provision(s): 1C7 — 27-3017 PERFORM UNLICENSED ELECTRICAL WORK
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review