What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 2 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Façade / Exterior Wall. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 10, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557919R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS.SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD IN USE AT EXP.1 W/O DIRECT SUPERVISION OF LICENSED RIGGER OR DESIGNATED RIGGING FOREMAN. UPON REQUEST, COMPETENT PERSON/WORKERS COULD NOT IDENTIFY RIGGING FOREMAN ON SITE. MOTOR CAPACITY/
Cited provision(s): 141 — 28-404.1 SUPERVISION OR USE OF RIGGING EQUIPMENT WITHOUT A RIGGER'S LICENSE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39557922H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS. FACADE WORK IN PROGRESS AT 25-STORY BLDG. REQ'D BC CH. 33 DOCS NOT MAINTAINED ON SITE/MADE AVAILABLE. UPON REQUEST, COMPETENT PERSON FAILED TO PROVIDE DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD/SWS, MFR. SPECS
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557920Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3314.4.5.4 OBS. WORKER PERFORMING WORK FROM SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD W/O REQ'D 16-HR SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD USER TRAINING CARD. UPON REQUEST, WORKER FAILED TO PROVIDE CERT./ID, LEFT TO RETRIEVE CARD & COULD NOT BE LOCAT
Cited provision(s): 129 — BC 3314.4.5 & 26-204.1(A) ERECTED, DISMANTLED REPAIRED, MAINTAINED, MODIFIED OR REMOVED SUPPORTE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557923J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3314.3.3 OBS. SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD STAIR TOWER AND SEPARATE BETA MAX MATERIAL HOIST INSTALLATION W/COUNTERWEIGHTS. UPON REQUEST, NO DESIGN DRAWINGS/DETAILS FOR THE STAIR TOWER, SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD, OR BETA MAX HOI
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557921X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS.WORK IN PROGRESS AT 25-STORY BLDG. REQ'D BC CH. 33 DOCS NOT MAINTAINED ON SITE/MADE AVAILABLE. UPON REQUEST, COMPETENT PERSON FAILED TO PROVIDE CD-5, PRE-INSTALL./INSTALL./POST-INSTALL. REPORTS, PLATFORM MF
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557924L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3307.4.7 - OBS. CONSTR. WORK IN PROGRESS WITHIN SWS WALKWAY AT EXP. 1. ACTIVE WORK AREA LACKED REQ'D BARRIERS/SAFEGUARDS TO RESTRICT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. PEDESTRIANS WERE PERMITTED TO PASS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO ON
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review