What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Demolition summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Vacate Order. The hearing dates are October 22, 2026, October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026, August 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39200540K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI NO APPROVED PLANS ON SITE. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 33.PERMIT # M01310272PL,M01310272GC, M01316830FN., MAINTAIN/DISPLAY REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39200538L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED OBSTRUCTED EXIT DOORWAYS AND REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS. CONSISTING OF DEBRIS, TRASH BAGS, WORKERS PERSONAL BELONGINGS,BUCKETS, TRASH CANS AND A DUST PAN. CREATING A HAZARDOUS CONDITION. ALL SEEN ON
Cited provision(s): 127 — 27-369,BC 1020.2 FAIL TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Demolition — Summons 39200541M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED EXCESSIVE DEBRIS THROUGHOUT ALL 6 FLOORS. CONSISTING OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN. JOB # M01310272, REPAIR AND/REPLACE; FOLLOW TPP
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Vacate Order — Summons 39200572P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOT COMPLYING WITH VACATE ORDER UNDER COMPLAINT # 1477683 FOR ECB 041818CER03DY . ALSO NOT COMPLYING WITH VACATE ORDER UNDER COMPLAINT # 1725325 UNDER DOB 374877 ., COMPLY WITH VACATE ORDER; COMPLY WITH COMMISS
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Demolition — Summons 39558174X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3303.2.3.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6 STORIES BUILDING UNDER ACTIVE DEMOLITION WORK IN PROGRESS, I OBSERVED SOME FLOORS AREA WHERE DEMOLITION WAS TAKEN PLACE WAS IN DARKNESS WITHOUT TEMPORARY LIGHTING FOR
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Demolition — Summons 39558173Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 3303.10.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6 STORIES BUILDING UNDER ACTIVE DEMOLITION , I OBSERVED TENANTS OCCUPIED 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR WHILE ACTIVE DEMOLITION IN ON GOING , UPON REQUEST FOR TENANTS PROTECTION PLAN
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review