What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Failure to Maintain. The hearing dates are October 20, 2026, October 29, 2026, October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 30, 2026, July 9, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557292M
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: EXPIRED SIDEWALK SHED PERMIT. NOTE AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED PERMIT EXPIRED ON 01/13/2025 AND NO PERMIT POSTED
Cited provision(s): 2P8
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557293Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF 7 STORY BUILDING OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE NOT MAINTAINED PER CODE WITH ROTTING BASE MUDSILLS CAUSING HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS.MAINTAIN
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557291K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF 7 STORY MIXED USE BUILDING OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED IN PLACE WITHOUT INFORMATION PANEL CAUSING HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS.PROVIDE PANEL
Cited provision(s): 217 — BC 3301.9,27-10009(C) FAIL TO PROVIDE/POST SIGN(S) AT JB SITE PURSUANT TO SUBSEC
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35690905N
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 9, 2025; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: PERMANENT DWELLING USED/CONVERTED FOR OTHER THAN PERMANENT RESIDENTIALPURPOSES. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO #M000021620 INDICATES PREMISES TO BE LEGALLY APPROVED AS A "CLASS A" MULTIPLE DWELLING. NOW APARTMENT
Cited provision(s): 2F3 — BC 28-210.3 PERM.DWELLING OFFERED/USED/CONV TO OTHER THAN PERM.RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 35690907R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 9, 2025; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. LACK OF REQUIRED NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS FOR EVERY FLOOR PER BC 1018.1; 27-366; BC 1021.1 FOR TRANSIENT USE FOR APARTMENT 10(1ST FLOOR). REMEDY: DISCONTI
Cited provision(s): 189 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER. FAILURE TO PR
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Failure to Maintain — Summons 35690906P
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 9, 2025; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER. LACK OF A AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. WHERE IS REQUIRED AS PER BC 903.2 AND 27-954 FOR TRANSIENT USE IN APARTMENT 10(1ST FLOOR). REMEDY: DISCONTINUE ILLEGA
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35690908Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 9, 2025; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: BC 907.2.8. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FOR TRANSIENT USE IN APARTMENT 10(1ST FLOOR). REMEDY: DISCONTINUE ILLEGAL USE.
Cited provision(s): 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review