What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment; Failure to Maintain. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 27, 2026, July 30, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39197684P
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 27, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FTM BOILER FOUND A WEIL MCLAIN MODEL EG35SPDN RATED AT 100000 BTUS WITH THESE VIOLATING CONDITIONS/COLD WATER RELIEF VALVE LEAKING/EXTROL EXPANSION TANK ROTTED AND WATER LOGGED CORRECT ALL VIOLATING CONDITIONS
Cited provision(s): 254 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39198403Y
CLASS - 3 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN. OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE#2, A/C UNIT LEANING DOWNWARDS. UNIT DOES HAVE BRACKETS, BUT ALSO NEEDS TO BE SECURED TO THE WALL., REPAIR AND OR REPLACE; REPLACE/REPAIR
Cited provision(s): 302 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review