What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Stop Work Order summonses; 2 Vacate Order summonses. The hearing dates are October 15, 2026, October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 1, 2026, August 5, 2026, July 30, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Stop Work Order — Summons 39198553J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: TAMPERED WITH REMOVED OR DEFACED A WRITTEN STOP WORK ORDER. OBSERVED REMOVAL OF THE STOP WORK ORDER THAT WAS PEELED OFF THE WINDOW. PSWO WAS POSTED AT PREMISES ON 07/17/2026 UNDER COMPLAINT # 1731068. NO RECISS
Cited provision(s): 1F8 — 28-207.2.5 TAMPERED WITH, REMOVED OR DEFACED A WRITTEN STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Vacate Order — Summons 39198740P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 1, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED 2 WORKERS ILLEGALLY IN BUILDING CONTRARY TO A FULL VACATE ORDER. WORKERS HAD BEEN PREFORMING WORK SINCE 7-17-26 AS NOTED IN COMP. #1471344. BUILDING WAS DEEMED UNSAFE AND NO CORRECTION HAS BEEN SUBMITT
Cited provision(s): 1F9 — 28-207.4 FAILURE TO OBEY A VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Vacate Order — Summons 39198741R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 1, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED IN A VACATE BUILDING LEGAL VACATE STICKER HAD BEEN REMOVED. BUILDING WAS VACATED UNDER COMP# 1471344, COMPLY WITH CODE; RESTORE VACATE ORDER
Cited provision(s): 1G1 — 28-207.4.4 REMOVED OR DEFACED A WRITTEN POSTED VACATE ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Vacate-order matters require confirming the exact areas and occupants covered by the order, correcting the conditions that caused the order, completing any required permits/inspections, and obtaining formal agency authorization before reoccupancy.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct premises/area and the same vacate order reflected in agency records?
- Was the area occupied on the cited date, and by whom?
- Had the agency already rescinded or modified the vacate order before the alleged occupancy?
Evidence that may matter
- Vacate Order and rescission/modification documents
- DOB/HPD records showing status and affected areas
- Photographs, access logs, leases or occupancy records
- Professional reports / inspection results documenting correction
Stop Work Order — Summons 39198739H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 1, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED 2 WORKERS CONDUCTING FRAMING AND STRUCTURE WORK AGAINST A STOP WORK ORDER ISSUED UNDER COMP #1731068. NO PERMIT WAS FILED FOR STRUCTURAL WORK. BUILDING IS DEEMED UNSAFE AND WAS VACATED 2-1-18 DUE TO COLLA
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Stop Work Order — Summons 39199330R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED THAT STOP WORK ORDER STICKER HAS BEEN REMOVED., COMPLY WITH CODE
Cited provision(s): 1F8 — 28-207.2.5 TAMPERED WITH, REMOVED OR DEFACED A WRITTEN STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review