What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Work Without a Permit summonses; Illegal Occupancy / Conversion; Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 14, 2026, May 30, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39149445L
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 30, 2025; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: HPD ICARD LIST BUILDING AS HAVING ONE CLASS A APT IN BASEMENT FOR SUPER, SECOND APT MADE IN BASEMENT NO PERMITS ON FILE FOR PLUMBING WORK DONE. BATHROOM AREA MADE WITH TOILET, SHOWER SECTION., OBTAIN PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39149446N
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 30, 2025; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: HPD ICARD LIST BUILDING AS HAVING ONE CLASS A APT IN BASEMENT FOR SUPER, SECOND APT MADE IN BASEMENT NO PERMITS ON FILE FOR CONSTRUCTION WORK DONE, WALLS PUT UP AND DOORS TO A MAKE 2 BEDROOMS APT, OBTAIN PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39149448R
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 30, 2025; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: HPD ICARD LIST BUILDING AS HAVING ONE CLASS A APT IN BASEMENT FOR SUPER, SECOND APT MADE IN BASEMENT NO PERMITS ON FILE FOR ELECTRICAL WORK DONE. WIRING WAS DONE FOR OUTLETS AND FOR LIGHTS., OBTAIN PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Illegal Occupancy / Conversion — Summons 39149457Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 30, 2025; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: HPD ICARD LIST BUILDING AS HAVING ONE CLASS APT IN BASEMENT FOR SUPER, SECOND ILLEGAL APT MADE IN BASEMENT WITH 2 BEDROOMS AND BATHROOM CONTRARY TO ORIGINAL OCCUPANCY OF BUILDING RESTORE BACK TO ORIGINAL ALLOWE
Cited provision(s): 108 — 28-118.3 ALTER/CHANGE BLDG OCCUP W/O VALID C/O PER 28-118.3.1,28-118.3.2
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The key question is whether the observed occupancy or layout matches the lawful use of the premises. Resolution may require restoring the prior lawful layout/use or, when legally feasible, filing plans and obtaining approvals to legalize the condition.
Hearing issues to verify
- What use and number of dwelling/occupancy units are shown by the Certificate of Occupancy, Schedule of Occupancy or other lawful-use records?
- Did the inspector accurately identify how the space was being used on the cited date?
- Was the cited space actually occupied as alleged, or were the observed beds, kitchens, locks or partitions consistent with another lawful use?
- Is there an approved filing or historical record supporting the present use?
Evidence that may matter
- Certificate of Occupancy / Schedule of Occupancy and approved plans
- Historic occupancy records, permits and prior approved layouts
- Dated photographs and floor plans
- Leases, tenant records or sworn statements concerning actual use
- Permits/inspection records if the condition was legalized or restored
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39200680M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 14, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FOUND ROCKMILLS OIL FIRED BOILER MODEL# MP-100 WITH OIL PUMP RUNNING CONSTANT ONLY TO RUN WHEN BURNER RUNS, BURNER IN NEED OF SERVICE SMOKES ON START UP, REQUEST COMBUSTION ANALYSIS TEST.
Cited provision(s): 256 — 27-904 & FGC 406.6.2 GAS BEING SUPPLIED TO BUILDING WITHOUT INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION BY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review