What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Elevator / Vertical Transportation. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 19, 2026, July 27, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39197692P
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 27, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2 ITEMS: PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM AND GOVERNOR ROOM TO COMPLETE THE INSPECTION. (NYC AC 28-304.1; ASME A17.1-2013 8.11.2.1). IN-CAR EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION INOPERATIVE. (2.27.1.1.3, 8.6
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558119N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED ERECTED AT EXP 1 OF 6 STORY OCCUPIED BUILDING. SWS NOT MAINTAINED AS PER CODE. AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED MISSING CATCH ALL PANEL AND INADEQUATE BASE FOR MUDSILLS ON SOIL. THESE UNS
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558120K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: SIDEWALK SHED PERMIT EXPIRED 06/15/2026
Cited provision(s): 2P8
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review