What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 8 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order summonses; 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Work Without a Permit; Illegal Occupancy / Conversion; Sign / Awning / Advertising. The hearing dates are October 19, 2026, October 2, 2026, October 20, 2026, October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 21, 2026, March 20, 2025, October 17, 2025, September 10, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39142319Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 20, 2025; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. AT TIME OF INSPECTION AT REAR YARD I OBSERVED ON PLANS THAT THE ENCLOSED SURFACE AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE A DOOR. THERE IS A DOOR IN NEW PARTITION LAYOUT T
Cited provision(s): 114 — 28-105.12.2 WK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPRV CONST DOC/AMENDS IN MANUF DIST RES USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Illegal Occupancy / Conversion — Summons 39159940H
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: ALTERED/CHANGED BUILDING OCCUPIED WITHOUT A VALID C OF O. OBSERVED OUTDOOR EATING ASSOCIATED WITH STORE, OBTAIN VALID C OF O OR DISCONTINUE ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY; AMEND C OF O
Cited provision(s): 108 — 28-118.3 ALTER/CHANGE BLDG OCCUP W/O VALID C/O PER 28-118.3.1,28-118.3.2
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The key question is whether the observed occupancy or layout matches the lawful use of the premises. Resolution may require restoring the prior lawful layout/use or, when legally feasible, filing plans and obtaining approvals to legalize the condition.
Hearing issues to verify
- What use and number of dwelling/occupancy units are shown by the Certificate of Occupancy, Schedule of Occupancy or other lawful-use records?
- Did the inspector accurately identify how the space was being used on the cited date?
- Was the cited space actually occupied as alleged, or were the observed beds, kitchens, locks or partitions consistent with another lawful use?
- Is there an approved filing or historical record supporting the present use?
Evidence that may matter
- Certificate of Occupancy / Schedule of Occupancy and approved plans
- Historic occupancy records, permits and prior approved layouts
- Dated photographs and floor plans
- Leases, tenant records or sworn statements concerning actual use
- Permits/inspection records if the condition was legalized or restored
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39159946Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONERS ORDER TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATION#3914230M, COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER; FILE A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Sign / Awning / Advertising — Summons 39159943N
CLASS - 3 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN. PACTION WALL OBSTRUCTING DROP LADDER , NO EXIT SIGN AND DOES NOT COMPLY TO PLANS#M00610909. EXPOSURE#3, REPAIR AND OR REPLACE; REPAIR/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 302 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Sign-related charges usually require confirming zoning/permit requirements, dimensions, illumination and placement, followed by permit/legalization or removal/modification.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the sign/awning exempt from a permit or already covered by an approved filing?
- Were the dimensions/location described by the inspector accurate?
- Was the sign removed or modified before the summons date or hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Sign permit / zoning documents
- Measured photographs and drawings
- Removal or modification invoice
- Prior approvals and storefront plans
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39163959J
CLASS - 1 · Issued October 17, 2025; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ON TIME OF CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION AUDIT, OWNER OF PROPERTY HAS FILED A FALSE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS , ECB VIOLATION #39076038J FOR PROHIBITED ACCORDION STYLE FLEX FLUE PIPE
Cited provision(s): 188 — 28-211.1 FILED A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OR OTHER RELATED MATERIALS CONTAININ
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39201361J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER. ECB VIOL#39159940H ISSUED:9/10/25 NOTED: ALTERED/CHANGED BUILDING OCCUPIED WITHOUT A VALID C OF O /OUTDOOR EATING ASSOCIATED WITH STORE ., COMPLY WITH
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39201362L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S ORDER TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS. ECB VIOL# 39159943N ISSUED: 9/10/25 NOTED: PARTITION WALL OBSTRUCTING DROP LADDER ,NO EXIT S
Cited provision(s): 263 — AC 28-204.4 FAIL TO COMPLY W/COMMISSIONER ORDER TO FILE CERT OF CORRECTION W/DOB
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39201388J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER. ECB VIOL.#039142319Z ISSUED ON :3/20/25 NOTED: WORK NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AT REAR OBSERVED ON PLANS THAT THE ENCLOSED SURFACE
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 8 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review