What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Site Safety / Safeguarding; Elevator / Vertical Transportation; Demolition. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557885H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 33 STORIES BUILDING UNDER INTERIOR DEMOLITION, I OBSERVED ACTIVE DEMOLITION OF VARIOUS FLOORS IN PROGRESS WITH DRAWINGS SHOWS FLOORS 1 TO 33 FLOOR TO BE DEMO, UPON REQUEST FOR DESIGNA
Cited provision(s): 1G6 — BC 3301.13.3 FAILURE TO DESIGNATE AND/OR HAVE A CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39557886J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: INSPECTION OF A 33 STORIES BUILDING UNDER INTERIOR DEMOLITION WITH TENANTS LIVING IN THE BUILDING I OBSERVED PASSENGER ELEVATORS IN THE BUILDING WAS BEING USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES MOVING DEBRIS WITH MINI
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Demolition — Summons 39557887L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 33 STORIES BUILDING UNDER INTERIOR DEMOLITION ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PROGRESS WITH TENANTS LIVING IN THE BUILDING UPON REQUEST FOR TENANT PROTECTION PLAN STAMPED BY PROFESS
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Demolition charges can involve missing permits, missing notifications, unsafe demolition practices or work outside approved scope. Resolution requires identifying the exact procedural/safety failure and completing the missing filing or corrective work.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a demolition permit or required notification in effect before work began?
- Did the cited activity constitute demolition under the applicable filing, or another permitted scope?
- Do contractor and agency records show the required notice was timely?
Evidence that may matter
- Demolition permit and DOB NOW filing history
- Required notification confirmation / timestamp
- Asbestos/environmental documents
- Contractor logs, photographs and demolition sequence records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review