What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Work Without a Permit; Crane / Hoist / Derricks. The hearing date is October 1, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556945X
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PSWO/ I OBSERVED COMPONENTS OF SUPP SCAFFOLD NOT TO CODE. WOODEN PLANKS NOT SECURED. RESTING ON METAL PLANKING. PLANKS NOT TIED DOWN BC 3314.5.5 GUARDRAIL SYSTEM NOT ADEQUATELY INSTALLED BC 3314.8 COUPLINGS N
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39556960Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, SITE SAFETY LOGS NOT SIGNED SINCE 07/07/26 BY SSM . MISSING LOGS AND NO CLEAR QSP SIGNATURES IN VIOLATION OF 3310.8.4KEEP ALL LOGS SIGNED AND UP TO DATE FILLED OUT PROPERLY
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556943M
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: I OBSERVED EXTENSION PLATFORM AT EXP#1 & 2 BY 6TH FLOOR INSTALLED AS WELL AS ACCESS STAIRWELL AT EXP#1 OF ROOF NOT REFLECTING OF SUBMITTED DRAWINGS IN VIOLATION OF 28-105.12.2
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39556965N
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: STOP ALL USE OF MATERIAL HOISTS APPLICATION# M01428831-I1-PMM ATOI, I OBSERVED MATERIAL HOIST MISSING MANUFACTURES IDENTIFICATION TAG MISSING ON MATERIAL HOIST BUCKET ON SITE LOCATED AT EXP#3 IN VIOLATION OF
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556944Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PSWO / FAILURE TO PROVIDE LOAD IMPOSED INSPECTION LETTER FOR SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD INSTALLED ON ROOF OF STRUCTURE IN VIOLATION OF BC 3314.3.4PROVIDE DOCUMENTS
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review