What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Failure to Maintain summonses; 2 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment. The hearing date is October 22, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 13, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39200658X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED IN THE MAIN MECHANICAL ROOM A GAS LINE BY THE BOILER WITH NO SUPPORTS CONTRARY TO FGC 407.2 - FUEL-GAS PIPING SHALL BE PROPERLY SUPPORTED AND ANCHORED TO PREVENT UNDUE STRAIN AND EXCESSIVE VIBRATI
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200662Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THROUGH OUT THE THE BUILDING TEMPORARY PLASTIC CAPS USED ON THE STAND PIPE HOSE CONNECTIONS AND IN THE BASEMENT GYM CAPS USED ON WASTE LINES ALSO METAL CUP USED AS A COP ON THE TOP OF A WASTE LINE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200468P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 1. ELEVATOR CAB HAS NO VENTILATION OPENINGS, REQUIRING FAN TO RUN AT ALL TIMES; FAN TESTED WITH SWITCH AND FOUND INOPERATIVE. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.14. REMEDY: RESTORE REQUIRED CAB VENTILATION AND REPAIR FAN TO E
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200659H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED IN THE MAIN SPRINKLER VALVE ROOM EXCESSIVE SOTRAGE NO STORAGE IS ALOUD IN MECHANICAL ROOM NO STORAGE IS ALOUD IN MECHANICAL ROOMS., REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200469R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2: 1. DEVICE NUMBER MISSING ON CAR OPERATING PANEL, FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED IDENTIFICATION. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.26. REMEDY: INSTALL REQUIRED DEVICE NUMBER ON COP. 2. ONE IN-CAR LIGHT INOPERATIVE. AS P
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200657Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED OUTSIDE OF THE MAIN MECHANICAL ROOM ON THE HEATER EXCHANGER FILER UNIT A COPPER PRO PRESS 90 WHICH WAS LEAKING OBSERVED A STUD UNDER THE LEAK REDIRECTING WATER TO A ROOF DRAIN
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200660P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 13, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED LACK OF SPRINKLER COVERAGE BY ROOMS 807 343 AND IN LAUNDRY ROOMS MISSING SPRINKLER HEAD CAPS AND CAPS PAINT/GLUED TO THE CEILING CONTRARY TO BC 903.3.3 - AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review