What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 9 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Plumbing / Gas; Work Without a Permit; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing date is October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39199415X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2: MAINTENANCE SERVICE LOG MISSING, FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED RECORD OF PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND TESTING. AS PER ASME A17.1 8.6. REMEDY: PROVIDE CURRENT MAINTENANCE SERVICE LOG AND MAINTAIN ACCURATE REC
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199450L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING OBSTRUCTED SPRINKLER HEADS AND LACK OF SPRINKLER COVERAGE WHICH IS CONTRARY TO FGC 903.3.3, REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39199458X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATION OF THE ELECTRICAL CODE TECHNICAL STANDARDS. OBSERVED IN THE BOILER RM THAT THE HUNG BOILER HAVE NO REMOTE SHUT DOWN AT THE POINT OF EGRESS. SHUT DOWN IS FOR ALL EMERGENCY USE M.C. 1006.8
Cited provision(s): 1D1 — EC-MISC MICELLANEOUS VIOLATION OF ELECTRICAL CODE TECHNICAL STANDARDS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39199416H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1 CEASE USE: DOOR ZONE RESTRICTOR DEVICE FOUND INOPERATIVE AS PER CODE ASME A17.1/CSA B44 - SECTION 2.26.5. ELEVATOR CAR DOORS CAN BE OPENED WHEN THE CAR IS NOT WITHIN THE DESIGNATED DOOR ZONE, CREATING A
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199451N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED IN BASEMENT GAS METER ROOM A LEAK ON THE RISER LEADING TO THE BUILDING , CON ED CAME TO SHUT OFF AND LOCK GAS WHICH SUPPLIED HOT WATER HEAT AND GAS DRYERS IN LAUNDRY ROOM, REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39199456M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES OR WIRING IN USE. OBSERVED IN KITCHEN SJ CORD PASSING THRU THE CEILING FOR 40 AMP RECEPTACLE, ALSO THRU OUT SEVERAL M
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 39199452P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED IN BASEMENT HOT WATER HEATER BLOWOFF ARE TIED TOGETHER DRAINING OUT THROUGH A NEIGHBORING BATHROOM SINK TRAP AND ALSO NO FLOOR DRAIN INSIDE MECHANICAL ROOM WHICH IS CONTRARY TO MC 1004.6; 1004.6,
Cited provision(s): 180 — PC-MISC,FGC-MISC,MC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39199457Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. OBSERVED IN KITCHEN NEW 50 AMP ELECTRIC OVEN INSTALLED , THRU OUT THE BASEMENT NEW ELECTRIC HUNG HEATERS INSTALLED, NEW CONDUITS AND PANEL INSTALLED FOR ALL NEW WORK. CHECKED B
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39199460P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO INSTALL GROUND-FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER (GFCI) PROTECTION AS REQUIRED. OBSERVED THRU OUT BUILDING THE PANELS ON THE FLOORS 1-5 FOR THE SLEEPING AREAS / DORMS NO ARC BREAKERS PROTECTION INSTALLED. NE
Cited provision(s): 2D5 — EC 210.8 FAIL TO INSTALL GROUND-FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER (GFCI) PROTECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 9 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review