What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 21 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 6 Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order summonses; 5 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; 5 Failure to Maintain summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Work Without a Permit; Other Building / Code Compliance; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Plumbing / Gas. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 15, 2026, October 20, 2026, October 22, 2026, October 8, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 11, 2026, August 17, 2026, August 3, 2026, July 24, 2026, July 28, 2025, July 28, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39197976R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: VF... HOIST MACHINE BRAKE MAINTENANCE TAG EXPIRED PROVIDE...8.6.4.6... MAINTENANCE LOG UPDATE MISSING PROVIDE.. 8.6.1.4...
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39197977Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 28, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: VF... CEASE USED...D L M INOPERATIVE..42-X-10.. DOOR POSITION MONITORING INOPERATIVE .THIS IS A CONTROLLER FEATURE WHICH INSURE PASSENGERS SAFETY ..8.6.4.13. (1) REPAIR D L M, CONTACT NYCDOB AT [email protected].. AN
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557024X
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 24, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTE: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED ERECTED AT EXPOURES#1 WITH MISSING 20 FEET EXTENSION AT (57 WEST 46 STREET) AS CODE (3307.6.3) REQUIRES. THIS CREATES INADEQUATE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION FROM
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39198911K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39121610L ISSUED ON 08-12-2024 FOR WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT., COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39198914X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED MANY HOLES PENETRATIONS WITH NO FIRE STOPPING CREATING CHIMNEY AFFECT AND AID FIRE AND SMOKE THROUGHOUT BUILDING. POTENTIAL HAZARD, PROVIDE/MAINTAIN FIRE STOPPING
Cited provision(s): 139 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: NO FIRE STOPPIN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39198917L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39121700P ISSUED ON 08-12-2024 FOR PERFORMED UNLICENSED ELECTRICAL WORK., FILE A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
Cited provision(s): 263 — AC 28-204.4 FAIL TO COMPLY W/COMMISSIONER ORDER TO FILE CERT OF CORRECTION W/DOB
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39198912M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39121695J ISSUED ON 08-12-2024 FOR ELECTRICAL CLOSET NOT DEDICATED TO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT ONLY., FILE A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
Cited provision(s): 263 — AC 28-204.4 FAIL TO COMPLY W/COMMISSIONER ORDER TO FILE CERT OF CORRECTION W/DOB
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39198915H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39121697N ISSUED ON 08-12-2024 FOR UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES, OR WIRING IN USE., FILE
Cited provision(s): 263 — AC 28-204.4 FAIL TO COMPLY W/COMMISSIONER ORDER TO FILE CERT OF CORRECTION W/DOB
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39198913Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39121612P ISSUED ON 08-12-2024 FOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER., REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Certificate of Correction / Commissioner Order — Summons 39198916J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 3, 2026; hearing October 8, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED WATER METER JUMPER HANGING NOT CONNECTED TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY OF GROUNDING SYSTEM ALSO FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39121699R ISSUED ON 08-12-2024 F
Cited provision(s): 1D9 — EC 250.64 FAIL TO INSTALL GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR AS PER SECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
This charge focuses on failure to complete or document the DOB correction process for an earlier summons. The practical task is usually to identify the underlying summons, confirm that its physical condition was actually corrected, and complete the current DOB Certificate of Correction requirements with the supporting proof and any applicable civil-penalty documentation.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was a Certificate of Correction already submitted or approved for the underlying summons before this charge was issued?
- Does DOB's record identify the same underlying summons number and correction deadline described in this citation?
- Was the physical condition actually corrected, and can that correction be tied to the cited condition rather than a different job or location?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW / AEU Certificate of Correction submission or approval record
- Before-and-after photographs tied to the cited condition
- Permits, inspection results, contractor receipts or professional statements supporting the correction
- Proof of applicable DOB civil-penalty payment or waiver, if required
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200133N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1 C/U: CAR OPERATING PANEL UNLOCKED AND CAN BE OPENED, EXPOSING LIVE INTERNAL COMPONENTS AND WIRING, CREATING A HAZARDOUS CONDITION. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.26. REMEDY FOR CLASS 1: CORRECT ALL CONDITIONS. REI
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39200134P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1 CEASE USE: DOOR ZONE RESTRICTOR DEVICE FOUND INOPERATIVE AS PER CODE ASME A17.1/CSA B44 - SECTION 2.26.5. ELEVATOR CAR DOORS CAN BE OPENED WHEN THE CAR IS NOT WITHIN THE DESIGNATED DOOR ZONE, CREATING A
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39155178R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 28, 2025; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: CEASE USE ITEM: BRAKE SHOES HAVE EXCESSIVE GAP AND NEED TO BE CORRE CTED. REMEDY: TO RESTORE SERVICE, EMAIL THE D.O.B. [email protected]. ELEVATOR DIVISION AT FOR A REINSPECTION. 97X10. CLASS 2 ITERMS: BRAK
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39155234M
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 28, 2025; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED MISSING DOORS ON ELECTRICAL /MECHANICAL ROOM DOORS. DOORS MUST HAVE PROPER HARDWARE., REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39200782N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. OBSERVED ON FLOORS 3, 6, 9, 12 NEW 200 AMP PANELS INSTALLED IN ELECTRICAL CLOSETS ALSO IN BASEMENT / CELLAR IN ELECTRICAL RM NEW 1 NEW 400 AMP SERVICE SW AND 4 200 AMP SERVICE
Cited provision(s): 1C9 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200843H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SPRINKLER HEADS AND CAP PAINTED ALSO OBSTRUCTED IN LOBBY (REPLACE PAINTED HEADS) CONTRARY TO . BC 903.3.3 OBSTRUCTED LOCATIONS IN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. IT MANDATES
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39200783P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GROUNDING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS. OBSERVED IN THE MAIN WATER METER ROOM THE BUILDING WATER METER WAS NOT JUMPED THE JUMPER WIRE IS FOUND HANGING. WATER METER MUST BE JUMPED AT ALL TIM
Cited provision(s): 2E2 — EC 250.4 FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GROUNDING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200844J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED GAS METER IN THE SAME ROOM AS ELECTRICAL BOXES GAS METERS ARE NOT ALOUD IN ELECTRICAL ROOMS CONTRARY TO NYC FGC 2022 APPENDIX E E.3, REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200784R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES OR WIRING IN USE. OBSERVED IN THE BASEMENT SJ CORD PASSING THRU WALL FEEDING A/C UNIT IN THE MEN'S LOCKER RM FLEX COR
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200842X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED HOLE PENETRATIONS AT BASEMENT LEVEL. WOOD CEILING, WOOD IS COMBUSTIBLE, IN IT ROOM. ELECTRICAL HAS HOLES AS WELL. PREVIOUS VIO # 39155235Y., REPAI
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 39200845L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 17, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED PVC BEING USED IN THE LAUNDRY ROOM FOR DRAINAGE AND SLOP SINK WITH OUT A TRAP CONTRARY TO PC 1002.1 PLUMBING FIXTURES AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROPERLY TRAPPED AND CONNEC
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 21 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review