What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding. The hearing dates are October 1, 2026, October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 11, 2026, June 8, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39555255Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 8, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED DESIGNATED RIGGER FOREMAN LETTER ON SITE ISSUED BY BIG SKY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; HOWEVER, WORK PERMIT IS HELD BY JE LEVINE BUILDERS, INC. REQUIRED DESIGNATION WAS NOT PROVIDED BY THE PERMIT HOLDER. F
Cited provision(s): 244 — AC 1RCNY9-01 LICENSED RIGGER DESIGNATED AN UNQUALIFIED FOREMAN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39555258J
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 8, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS WITHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT ADEQUATELY EXERCISING DIRECT OVERSIGHT& ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. REQUIRED SITE SAFETY CONTROLS, CO
Cited provision(s): 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557777K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED AREA WHERE WORKER IN 10 B APARTMENT WAS INJURED WHILE SANDING CEILING AREA ON A 3' A-FRAME LADDER CAUSING FALL RESULTING IN BACK INJURY. UNABLE TO WALK EMS RECUED AND TAKEN TO HAR
Cited provision(s): 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review