What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 9 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 5 Work Without a Permit summonses; 4 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses. The hearing date is October 1, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556967R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED IN A NONCONFORMING MANNER. FIELD CONDITIONS DID NOT CONFORM TO THE DOB APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. SIDEWALK SHED WAS MISSING REQUIRED BAYS, OPENINGS, TRUSSES, CROSS BRACES, AND
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556976Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD IN USE&READILY AVAILABLE FOR USE. THE SPECIAL RIGGER FAILED TO PERFORM A SAFE &PROPER INSPECTION. THE INSTALLATION DID NOT CONFORM TO THE APPROVED CD5 AND INCLUDED MISSING REQUIRED T
Cited provision(s): 149 — BC 3314.4.3.1 (2008 CODE), 27-1045 & BC 3314.4.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO PERFORM SAFE/PROPER INSPECTION OF SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556979Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD OPERATIONS. UPON REQUEST, MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS,FOR 12,50-LB MOTORS, PENDENTS,COMPONENTS WERE NOT PROVIDED. COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED CD5 AND CODE COULD NOT BE VERIFIED, CREATING
Cited provision(s): 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556968Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS SUPP. SCAFFOLD@ ROOF LEVEL INSTALLED &IN USE IN A NONCONFORMING MANNER.APPROVED PLANS INDICATED OUTRIGGERS(BIKE) ON 2 FT.&3 FT.BICYCLE BRACKETS; FIELD CONDITIONS CONSISTED OF 4 FT. 4 IN. PIPE&KNUCKLE INSTAL
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556977K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: 3314.15.2: OBS SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD PLATFORM INSTALLED & AVAILABLE FOR USE WITH STIRRUPS POSITIONED APPROX. 6 TO 7 FT. FROM THE PLATFORM ENDS,&LESS AT SOME LOCATIONS, INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 8 TO 10 FT. CONFIGURA
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556966P
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBS SSP DID NOT CONFORM TO THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCS& AMENDMENTS. ALTHOUGH THE PLAN PERMITTED COMBINED PHASES &REQUIRED PROTECTIONS, IT FAILED TO INDICATE SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD DROPS,ROOF SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD L
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556969K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED CHAIN-LINK FENCE INSTALLED ALONG THE SITE PERIMETER WITHOUT A VALID DOB PERMIT AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION. FENCE WAS ERECTED AND MAINTAINED WITHOUT THE REQUIRED PERMIT, CONSTITUTING UNPERMITTED WORK
Cited provision(s): 2L1 — 28-105.1 FAILURE TO OBTAIN A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATIO
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39556975R
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED OUTRIGGER BEAM INSTALLATION IN USE ON PIPE-FRAME SUPPORTS WITH 4 FT. 10 IN. OUTREACH AND A 1,250-LB MOTOR WHERE THE APPROVED CD5 PERMITTED 1,000 LBS. REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TIEBACKS WERE NOT PROVIDED, TIE
Cited provision(s): 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39556978M
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD EQUIPMENT INSTALLED AND AVAILABLE FOR USE. NONE OF THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS WERE PROVIDED FOR THE BEE ACCESS 5X5 OUTRIGGER BEAM ASSEMBLY,OUTRIGGER (16 FT), 1,250-LB HOIST MOTORS, PENDA
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 9 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review