What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Façade / Exterior Wall; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing date is October 1, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 35730073N
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 20, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING FACADE WALL"S" AND APPURTENANCES. NOTE: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED AT MAIN ROOF, UNSECURED OUTDOOR FURNITURE THAT APPEARS TO HAVE FLEW OFF MAIN ROOF AND CAUSED DAMAGE TO
Cited provision(s): 104 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35730074P
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 20, 2026; hearing October 1, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT THAT BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAS BECOME POTENTIALLY COMPROMISED. NOTE: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED THAT OUTDOOR FURNITURE AT ROOF LEVEL FLEW OFF MAIN ROOF ONT
Cited provision(s): 1A9 — 28-216.12.6 FAILURE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY DEPARTMENT THAT BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HA
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review