What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; 2 Elevator / Vertical Transportation summonses; Other Building / Code Compliance; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit. The hearing dates are October 22, 2026, October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 18, 2026, August 20, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39200881Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATION OF THE ELECTRICAL CODE TECHNICAL STANDARDS. OBSERVED ON ALL FLOORS THRU OUT BUILDING THAT THE ELECTRICAL CLOSETS AND MECHANICAL CLOSETS AND FIRE ALARM CLOSETS HAS NO LIGHTING FOR REPAIRS
Cited provision(s): 2C6 — EC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATION OF ELECTRICAL CODE TECHNICAL STANDARDS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200884Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THROUGH OUT THE BUILDING OBSTRUCTED SPRINKLER HEADS AND PAINTED CAPS BY THE 04 ROOMS THE TELECOM/LINEN CLOSETS SPRINKLERS HAD THE PROTECTIVE CAPS ON STILL AND PAINTED ALSO STUFFED TO THE HEADS WIT
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200880R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ELECTRICAL CLOSET NOT DEDICATED TO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT ONLY. OBSERVED ON THE ROOF THE ELECTRICAL CLOSET AND THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM IN THE BASEMENT THE STORAGE OF BUILDING SUPPLIES ICE MAKER, BU
Cited provision(s): 1D3 — EC 110.25 ELECTRIACAL CLOSET NOT DEDICATEDE TO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION EQUIP ONL
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200885X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 22, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED PVC PIPING USED ON THE LAUNDRY ROOM WASHING MACHINE WASTE & ON THE SLOP SINK ALSO THE BASEMENT BATHROOM CONTRARY TO PC 1002.1 & PC 1101.10, REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39201167X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1 C/U: 1. ALARM BELL AND EMERGENCY PHONE INOPERATIVE, FAILING REQUIRED EMERGENCY ALERTING AND TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.27 AND 2.14; CONDITION MEETS CLASS 1 C/U CRITERIA PER 1 RCNY 102-01
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39201168H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 2: 1. EMERGENCY PHONE INOPERATIVE; RESPONDENT UNABLE TO HEAR OCCUPANT IN THE CAR, FAILING REQUIRED TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.27. REMEDY: REPAIR EMERGENCY PHONE AND VERIFY CLEAR, RELIABLE
Cited provision(s): 251 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER:SERVICE EQUIPMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review