Crane / Hoist / Derricks — Summons 39198436K
DOB allegation in the source extract: (1RCNY 3319-01(C)(5)(I)(A)THE MOBILE CRANE(CD5380 CN45826) USER NYC CONSTRUCTORS,LLC FAILED TO NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT PROPERLY OF THE CRANES ARRIVAL ON 7/30/2026. THEY MUST MAKE THE NOTIFICATION 24-48 HOURS PRIO
Cited provision(s): 2J9 — 1 RCNY 3319-01(C)(5) EQUIPMENT USER FAILED TO MAKE THE PROPER NOTIFICATION TO THE DEPARTMEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Crane/hoist matters are specialized safety and licensing cases. Resolution generally requires the correct equipment permit/notification, licensed operator/equipment records, inspections and compliance with site-specific lifting/safety requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the cited equipment and activity require the permit/notification alleged?
- Was the operator/equipment authorization current on the inspection date?
- Do logs and inspection records contradict the unsafe condition described?
Evidence that may matter
- Equipment permit / CD filing
- Operator license and equipment certification
- Inspection / maintenance / lift-plan records
- Dated site photographs and safety logs