What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Site Safety / Safeguarding summonses; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 15, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 8, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39557694P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 11 STORIES BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION , I OBSERVED WORKERS ON SITE INSTALLING RAILING AND PERFORMING WELDING ACTIVITIES ON 11 FLOORS ON SATURDAY APPROXIMATELY 10 AM WITHOUT OBTAINING
Cited provision(s): 1C6 — 28-105.1 WORK AFTER HOURS W/O VARIANCE PERMIT CONTRARY TO 28-105.12.5
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557701Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 11 STORIES BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVE JOBSITE, I OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ON SITE PERFORMING OPERATIONS, UPON REQUEST TO SEE SITE SAFETY COORDINATOR WHO SUPPOSE TO OVERSE
Cited provision(s): 119 — BC 3310.5,27-1009(D) FAIL TO HAVE SITE SAFETY MGR/COORDINATOR PRESENT AS REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557702X
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 11 STORIES BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVE JOBSITE, I OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ON SITE PERFORMING OPERATIONS, UPON REQUEST TO SEE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT WHO SUPPOSE TO OV
Cited provision(s): 1G6 — BC 3301.13.3 FAILURE TO DESIGNATE AND/OR HAVE A CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557703H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 11 STORIES BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVE JOBSITE, I OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ON SITE PERFORMING OPERATIONS, UPON REQUEST FOR WORKERS SITE SAFETY ORIENTATION, PRE SHIFT SAFET
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review