What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Construction Fence; Work Without a Permit. The hearing dates are October 16, 2026, October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 10, 2026, August 18, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 35728325H
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CONSTRUCTION FENCE NOT MAINTAINED IN CODE-COMPLIANCE. OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION FENCE IN STATE OF DISREPAIR MULTIPLE PANEL HAS COLLAPSED INTO PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK AND MULTIPLE PANELS LEANING TOWARD PEDESTRIAN SIDEWA
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Construction Fence — Summons 35728326J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PERMIT EXPIRED. OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION FENCE IN PLACE HOWEVER PERMIT X00802283 HAS EXPIRED ON 02/15/2024. REMEDY: OBTAIN/RENEW PERMIT.
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Construction-fence charges generally require bringing the fence, gates, viewing panels, height and site protection into compliance with the approved construction-safety setup and maintaining it for the required duration.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the fence configuration on the inspection date match the approved/logistics plan?
- Was the cited opening or defect temporary and promptly corrected?
- Was a permit or construction-fence filing active where required?
Evidence that may matter
- Approved construction-fence/site logistics documents
- Dated photographs
- Contractor logs and correction invoice
- Permit/filing record
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39200861L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. NOTED BUILDING HAS BEEN OBSERVED HAVING ERECTED APPROX. 160 LF OF CHAIN LINK FENCING AT EXPOSURE #1 OF THE PROPERTY. CONTRARY TO IED #20511 WHICH REQUIRED DAMAGED PANELS TO BE REPLACED WI
Cited provision(s): 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review