What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Other Building / Code Compliance. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 10, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199952L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI AT EXPO #1, #2, #3, AND #4, OBSERVED SEVERAL WINDOW-MOUNTED A/C UNITS WITHOUT REQUIRED FALL PROTECTION OR ADEQUATE SECURING. THIS CONDITION CREATES A FALLING-OBJECT HAZARD TO PEDESTRIANS, TENANTS, VISITORS
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199953N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED OFF OF EACH STAIR DISCHARGE COMBINATION EXIT SIGN/EMERGENCY LIGHTS NOT OPERATING WHEN TEST BUTTONS WERE PRESSED. REPAIR OR REPLACE NONFUNCTIONING EXIT SIGNS/EMERGENCY LIGHTS., REPAIR AND/OR REPLAC
Cited provision(s): 238 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: LACK OF EMERGEN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39199951J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED TWO STAIRWELLS FROM THE LOBBY TO THE ROOF WITHOUT REQUIRED FLOOR AND STAIR DESIGNATIONS. THIS INFORMATION MUST BE POSTED FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE PERSONNEL. POST FLOOR AND STAIR DESIGNATIONS AND FIL
Cited provision(s): 235 — 27-393, BC 1019.1.7 (2008 CODE) & BC 1022.8 (2014 CODE) STAIR AND/OR FLOOR IDENTIFICATION SIGNS MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review