What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing date is October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 16, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557993P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED PROPOSED 9-STORY BUILDING WITH WORK DECK AT 4TH-FLOOR LEVEL. REQUIRED VERTICAL WAS NOT PROVIDED AT EXPOSURES 2 AND 4. CONDITION MAY ALLOW FALLING MATERIALS TO REACH THE PUBLIC WA
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557991L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED PROPOSED 9-STORY BUILDING WITH WORK DECK AT 4TH-FLOOR LEVEL. SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 2 WAS NOT EXTENDED THE REQUIRED 5 FEET OVER THE SIDEWALK. CONDITION DOES NOT PROVIDE REQUIR
Cited provision(s): 1N8
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557994R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED PROPOSED 9-STORY BUILDING WITH WORK DECK AT 4TH-FLOOR LEVEL. NO ADEQUATE OVERHEAD PROTECTION WAS PROVIDED OVER THE ADJACENT BUILDING ROOF AT 1827 WATERLOO PLACE, EXPOSURE 2. COND
Cited provision(s): 1P4
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557992N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 16, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED PROPOSED 9-STORY BUILDING WITH WORK DECK AT 4TH-FLOOR LEVEL. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AT EXPOSURE 2 WAS LESS THAN 4 FEET WIDE AND UNEVEN, CREATING A TRIP HAZARD AND RESTRICTING SAFE PE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review