What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Failure to Maintain summonses. The hearing date is October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 21, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201396J
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED HOLE PENETRATIONS ON 1ST FLOOR BATHROOM AND STORAGE ROOM. SOME HOLES COVER WITH VENT COVERS. ALSO THROUGHOUT BASEMENT LEVEL., REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201400N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED FRESH AIR COVER MISSING ON EXPOSURE 2, TROUGH DRAIN IN DRIVEWAY IS COLLAPSED PER PC 102.3 MAINTENANCE INSTALLATIONS BOTH EXISTING AND NEW AND PARTS THEREOF SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PROPER OPERATING
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201401P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED SPRINKLER HEADS OBSTRUCTED THROUGHOUT BUILDING, DRYER IN BASMENT NOT VENTED. PER FGC 903.3.3 OBSTRUCTED LOCATIONS IN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. IT MANDATES THAT SPRINKLERS BE POSITIONED TO
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review