What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment; Façade / Exterior Wall; Egress / Exit Obstruction. The hearing dates are October 13, 2026, October 19, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 1, 2025, September 10, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 37035969Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 1, 2025; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO FILE REQUIRED ANNUAL BOILER INSPECTION REPORTS FOR LOW-PRESSURE BOILER 20000011097Y0001 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT. 1RCNY 103-01(D)(1) REQUIRES THAT AN ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT FO
Cited provision(s): 265 — 28-303.7 FAILURE TO FILE A COMPLETE BOILER INSPECTION REPORT.
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 35717639R
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG EXTERIOR FACADE AND APPURTENANCES.-NOTE: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED EXP #1 WEST, #2 NORTH, #3 EAST, #4 SOUTH-CRACKED/SPALLING BRICK AT PARAPET LEVEL MULTI LOC.-EXP #1 WEST, #2 NO
Cited provision(s): 104 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 35717640Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 10, 2025; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY.-NOTE: AT TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED OBJECTS ON FIRE ESCAPE LANDINGS AT EXP #2 NORTH, #3 EAST MULTI LOC.-EXP #2 NORTH-DEFECTIVE FIRE ESCAPE DROP LADDER IS DETA
Cited provision(s): 127 — 27-369,BC 1020.2 FAIL TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review