What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Failure to Maintain summonses; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 12, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200299N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED AT BASEMENT, UNAPPROVED, UNSAFE, UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES, AND/OR WIRING WERE OBSERVED IN USE. OPEN ELECTRICAL PANEL AND BOX WITH EXPOSED LIVE ELE
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200302P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: A/C UNITS THAT WERE UNSECURED DUE TO MISSING SUPPORT BRACKETS. THIS CONDITION CREATES A SERIOUS FALLING-OBJECT HAZARD, AS UNSECURED A/C UNITS COULD POTENTIALLY FALL AND STRIKE PEDESTRIANS, TENANTS, VISITORS, OR
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39200300L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE CELLAR AND BASEMENT, BOILER ROOM AND COORIDORS PIPING WAS OBSERVED PENETRATING FIRE-RATED CEILING AND WALLS. THE PENETRATIONS OPENING REMAIN , FIRE STOPPING NOT APPLIED ,SEAL ALL OPENINGS AT FIRE SEPERAT
Cited provision(s): 239 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: NO FIRE STOPPIN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200303R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THAT THE BUILDING ENCLOSURE AT THE GAS METER LOCATION WAS NOT MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN FILED UNDER JOB NO. X00505305-P1, PAGE PL-003.00. THE APPROVED PLAN SHOWS AN ENCLOSED
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200301N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 12, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, OBSERVED AN APPROXIMATELY 10-FOOT-HIGH BY 60 FT WIDE RETAINING WALL. THE WALL IS SHOWING CRACKS IN SEVERAL AREAS, WITH SOME STONES BECOMING LOOSE. THE WALL ALSO EXHIBITS SIGNS
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review