What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Electrical Work / Electrical Permit summonses; Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment; Work Without a Permit; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 11, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200152Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED FAIL TO MAINTAIN , AT GAS METER ROOM MISSING FRESH AIR INTAKE , AT LAUNDRY ROOM CEILING EXPOSED GAS WASTE WATER AND WASTE PIPES AS WELL AS ELECTRICAL WIRING , OSP GAS SERVICE PUMP CONNECTED WITH N
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39200150P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED UNPROTECTED PIPING PENETRATIONS AT THE CELLAR BOILER ROOM AND LAUNDRY ROOM. THE PENETRATIONS LACK THE REQUIRED FIRESTOPPING ASSEMBLIES. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEMBLIES SH
Cited provision(s): 239 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: NO FIRE STOPPIN
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39200153K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED UNAPPROVED, UNSAFE, UNSUITABLE, NONCOMPLIANT ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, AND/OR WIRING IN USE AT THE LAUNDRY ROOM. THE ELECTRICAL PANEL WAS OBSERVED WITH A MISSING BREAKER
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39200151R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THAT THE COMPACTOR THAT BEEN INSTALLED UNDER PERMIT# 200262562 , HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE CELLAR . THE INCINERATOR ROOM IS CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR STORAGE. NO PERMIT WAS FOUND FOR THE REMOVAL OF
Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39200154M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 11, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, FOUR (4) GAS-FIRED DRYERS WERE OBSERVED IN THE LAUNDRY ROOM WITHOUT THE REQUIRED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION **903.2.11.13** OF THE DOB CODE ., REPAIR AND/REPLA
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review