What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 4 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Façade / Exterior Wall. The hearing dates are October 16, 2026, October 19, 2026, October 2, 2026, October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 21, 2026, August 7, 2026, July 27, 2026, May 20, 2024.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557076H
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 27, 2026; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6-STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED ERECTED AROUND THE ENTIRE BUILDING NOT MAINTAIN AS PER CODE 3307.6.3 AREA TO BE PROTECTED DEBRIS NETTING WAS NOT PROVIDED WHERE REQUIR
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 35730858N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY. NOTED AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED NUMEROUS FLOWER POTS ARE STORED ON THE FIRE ESCAPE HORIZONTAL LANDINGS AT EXPOSURE 2 5TH FLOOR AND AT EXPOSURE 3 3RD F
Cited provision(s): 127 — 27-369,BC 1020.2 FAIL TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 35730859P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 7, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS. NOTED AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION I OBSERVED DEFECTIVE/INADEQUATE SHED CONDITIONS I. E. DEFECTIVE/DAMAGED MUDSILLS AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS WHICH IS NOT IN CO
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 35685237K
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 20, 2024; hearing October 19, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER. NOTES: DOB#040424CLL1101JF REQUIRES OWNER TO PROVIDE A PE/RA REPORT TO THE FACADE UNIT DUE TO HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS RESULTING IN INCIDENT #DOB43067. AS
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558194N
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6-STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED NOT MAINTAINED AS PER CODE 3307.6.5.6 UNCAPS BOLTS NOT PROTECTED, BENT CROSS BRACE OBSERVED AND PARAPET WALL ERECTED ABOVE LOOSE AND N
Cited provision(s): 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558193L
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, I OBSERVED A SIDEWALK SHED ERECTED AROUND A 6-STORY OCCUPIED BUILDING. RESEARCH OF DOB NOW AND BIS RECORDS INDICATES THAT SIDEWALK SHED PERMIT #X00813201-I1-SH EXPIRED ON 08/08/2026 A
Cited provision(s): 2P8
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review