What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 8 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 5 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Stop Work Order; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold; Work Without a Permit. The hearing date is October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 20, 2026, August 25, 2026, August 26, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558157Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED STREET OBSTRUCTED CLOSED FOR CONSTRUCTION OPERATION WITH BOOM TRUCK AND DELIVERY TRUCK AT EXP#1. UPON REQUESTING SSC FOR DOT PERMIT AND RESEARCH OF DOT WEBSITE REVEAL TH
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558162Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 8-STORY PROPOSED NEW BUILDING, ACTIVE SITE I OBSERVED MULTIPLE LOCATION UNCAPPED REBAR THROUGHOUT INSIDE OF THE SITE 2ND FLOOR DECK, CREATING A HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOR WORKERS AND FIR
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Stop Work Order — Summons 39558386H
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 25, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF REINSPECTION OF SWO UNDER COMPLAINT #2448549, REQUIRING ALL WORK TO STOP WITHIN 20 FT OF EDGE AT EXPOSURE 2 AND 10 FT AT EXPOSURE 4 AT 2ND FLOOR DECK. OBSERVED 2ND-FLOOR DECK COMPLETELY COVERED WITH
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558403K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 26, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 8-STORY PROPOSED NB, I OBSERVED AT EXP #1 THAT PLASTIC JERSEY BARRIERS WERE NOT MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BC 3301.1.3 THE BARRIERS WERE NOT PROPERLY FILLED WITH WATER OR SAND,
Cited provision(s): 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558158X
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF AN 8-STORY PROPOSED NEW BUILDING, ACTIVE SITE FRAMING OPERATION ON THE 2ND FLOOR DECK, I OBSERVED ADJACENT PROPERTIES EXPOSURE#2-4 WINDOW WITHIN 20FT OF THE JOBSITE, FIRE ESCAPE AND
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558404M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 26, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 8-STORY BUILDING, I OBSERVED AT EXP#4 SIDE DRIVE VERTICAL POSTED DOES NOT HAS HIGH VISIBLE MARKING AS PER CODE 3307.6.4.4 AND AS PER 3307.2.6 JOBSITE FAILURE TO MAINTAIN CLEAR 5 F
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39558156M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF THE ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE FOR A PROPOSED 8-STORY NEW BUILDING, A WORKER PERFORMING FRAMING OPERATION WAS OBSERVED STANDING ON A CLOSED A-FRAME LADDER LEANED AGAINST VERTICAL POST
Cited provision(s): 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39558160P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 20, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF 8-STORY PROPOSED NB, ACTIVE SITE I OBSERVED THE STRUCTURE ABOVE THE FENCE REVIEW OF THE APPROVED SITE SAFETY PLAN NOTED THAT OVERHEAD PROTECTION SHALL PROVIDED EXP#2-3-4 AS PER PLAN
Cited provision(s): 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 8 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review