What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Façade / Exterior Wall; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 5, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39199317M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED CRACK AT BUILDING FRONT EXTERIOR PARAPET WALL & DAMAGE TO FRONT 2ND FLOOR EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL (FURMAN AVE SIDE). VARIOUS WINDOW AC UNITS MISSING EXTERIOR SUPPORT BRACKET & 2 AC UNITS INSTALLED AT WIND
Cited provision(s): 204 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199316K
CLASS - 3 · Issued August 5, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED IN APARTMENT # 1H BEDROOMS HOLE OPENING AT CEILING AROUND HEAT PIPING, MISSING LIGHT FIXTURE SHADE & EVIDENCE OF MOLD IN SECTION OF BATHROOM WALL PLUS ITEMS STORED AT BUILDING INTERIOR HALLWAY-1ST FLOO
Cited provision(s): 302 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review