What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Façade / Exterior Wall summonses; 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Elevator / Vertical Transportation. The hearing dates are October 16, 2026, October 30, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 18, 2026, August 21, 2026, August 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 35730739K
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 6, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY. OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING, OBJECT STORED AT FIRE ESCAPE LANDING ON EXPOSURE 2 7TH FLOOR. REMEDY: REMOVE EGRESS OBSTRUCTION.
Cited provision(s): 127 — 27-369,BC 1020.2 FAIL TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED EXIT PASSAGEWAY
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39558104K
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6-STORY BUILDING UNDER FACADES REPAIRS, I OBSERVED PLASTIC JERSEY BARRIERS AND PORTA-POTTY OBSTRUCTION THE ROADWAY WHERE CAR PARK. UPON REQUEST WORKERS, RESEARCH DOT WEBSITE AND
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558105M
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6-STORY BUILDING, I NOTICED SIDEWALK SHED ERECTED NOT MAINTAIN AS PER CODE 3307.6.5.5 & 3303.4.4.1 THROUGHOUT SIDEWALK SHED BRICKS GARBAGE BAG CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS HAS LEFT ON TOP OF S
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39201330R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 21, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ELEVATOR IN CODE COMPLAINT MANNER AS PER BC 3001.2 & 27-987 CLASS 1 VIOLATION: EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DEVICE INOPERATIVE, THIS A DEVICE IMPERATIVE FOR TENANTS SAFETY, REMEDY: FIX AND EMAIL
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39558103Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF THE 6-STORY ALTERATION JOB, SUPPORTED SCAFFOLDING WAS OBSERVED ERECTED WITH LOOSE VERTICAL NETTING THAT WAS NOT PROPERLY MAINTAINED AS PER BC 3314.8.2 THIS CONDITION PRESENTS AN IMMEDIA
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39558106Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 18, 2026; hearing October 30, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 6-STORY BUILDING UNDER FACADES REPAIRS, I OBSERVED WORKERS USING PIPE SCAFFOLDING, UPON REQUESTING THE COMPETENT PERSON NON WAS ONSITE AS REQUIRE BY CODE 3314.4.5.1 AND UPON REQUE
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review