What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses. The hearing date is October 16, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 31, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557373Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 31, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED UNSAFE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD ACTIVITIES. WORKER ON SCAFFOLD ABOVE 6 FEET IN HEIGHT WAS INADEQUATELY ATTACHED TO COLD FORM STEEL USING A PELICAN HOOK NOT FULLY CLOSED. ALSO OBSERVED O
Cited provision(s): 2P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557372M
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 31, 2026; hearing October 16, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED WORKERS USING SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD. UPON REQUESTING TO SEE REQUIRE WORKER WALLET CARD THEM COULD NOT PROVIDE. ONLY SST PROVIDE THERE I NOTICE ONE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD USER (CRISTIAN M
Cited provision(s): 2L3 — BC 3321.1 FAILURE TO ENSURE EACH WORKER HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review